-I'm very much ready for the weather to start acting like spring, mmkay. I had the totally awesome luck of dropping my car keys somewhere on campus yesterday and having to retrace my steps a few times in the freezing cold before resigning myself to the fact that I wasn't going to find them, and thank the lord for a man who knows where to find my spare keys even when I don't know where they are but for half the time Shep was on his way over to give them to me I was on the phone with him whimpering, "I'M NOT WARM." And I just got this nice new Swiss Army knife that was attached to the keys. Bahh.
-One of the many annoying oversimplifying attitudes I see directed at Wuthering Heights made me curious about what the initial critical response was to it, and some of the stuff quoted on Wikipedia is backwardly amusing to me:
"There is not in the entire dramatis persona, a single character which is not utterly hateful or thoroughly contemptible ... Even the female characters excite something of loathing and much of contempt. Beautiful and loveable in their childhood, they all, to use a vulgar expression, "turn out badly."
EVEN THE FEMALE CHARACTERS. You don't say?
"How a human being could have attempted such a book as the present without committing suicide before he had finished a dozen chapters, is a mystery. It is a compound of vulgar depravity and unnatural horrors."
WELL.
To be honest it has been a long time since I read Wuthering Heights and I would probably fail to back up anything I have to say about it but, while Emily may not have much on someone like Mary Shelley, I've always felt that from time periods in which female creativity was pretty much encouraged to be merely decorative, for women to write such unflinchingly dark characters/themes is just kind of badass, and to me there's something that feels relatively uncensored about WH that gives me a strong loyalty to it. And even if I don't know that I would ship the love story exactly, I've always been fascinated by the fundamentals of that kind of romance - if you can call it a romance - where the love may have once been good, in a vacuum of innocence, but when it's thwarted and denied the whole momentum of it becomes destructive to everyone around it and to the affection itself.
-Haven't been watching the Star Trek trailers that are rolling out so I'm going to be maybe a lot more surprised by this movie than other people. I've seen and probably will see a couple trailers in the theater but that's enough for me. I feel like there was an article that gave away the villain, even? I'm getting more and more annoyed with the gimme-gimme-spoilers culture of the internet, even though I don't treat it like it's the end of the world if I do get spoiled.
-One of the many annoying oversimplifying attitudes I see directed at Wuthering Heights made me curious about what the initial critical response was to it, and some of the stuff quoted on Wikipedia is backwardly amusing to me:
"There is not in the entire dramatis persona, a single character which is not utterly hateful or thoroughly contemptible ... Even the female characters excite something of loathing and much of contempt. Beautiful and loveable in their childhood, they all, to use a vulgar expression, "turn out badly."
EVEN THE FEMALE CHARACTERS. You don't say?
"How a human being could have attempted such a book as the present without committing suicide before he had finished a dozen chapters, is a mystery. It is a compound of vulgar depravity and unnatural horrors."
WELL.
To be honest it has been a long time since I read Wuthering Heights and I would probably fail to back up anything I have to say about it but, while Emily may not have much on someone like Mary Shelley, I've always felt that from time periods in which female creativity was pretty much encouraged to be merely decorative, for women to write such unflinchingly dark characters/themes is just kind of badass, and to me there's something that feels relatively uncensored about WH that gives me a strong loyalty to it. And even if I don't know that I would ship the love story exactly, I've always been fascinated by the fundamentals of that kind of romance - if you can call it a romance - where the love may have once been good, in a vacuum of innocence, but when it's thwarted and denied the whole momentum of it becomes destructive to everyone around it and to the affection itself.
-Haven't been watching the Star Trek trailers that are rolling out so I'm going to be maybe a lot more surprised by this movie than other people. I've seen and probably will see a couple trailers in the theater but that's enough for me. I feel like there was an article that gave away the villain, even? I'm getting more and more annoyed with the gimme-gimme-spoilers culture of the internet, even though I don't treat it like it's the end of the world if I do get spoiled.